If you can conceive of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, written on a vertical column - it starts with 1 and then goes up 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, with 8 at the top and 1 at the bottom. And then below 1, going down vertically, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8.

And I just got through telling you I spent the morning auditing this case - part of the morning - which has been audited before.

Now 1 - this will work out that 1 and 1 is normal - covert hostility. That's a joke.

In 1951 I released techniques to at least two of the auditors who have audited this case and as far as I know these techniques have not been utilized.

Now, as you go up from 1 and down from 1, you could think of this as two cones come out from the same center. Now, progressively up from 1 would be out through the top; that is to say, conquest of the MEST universe. This would be the direction we would follow. We'd conquer 1, then conquer 2, then conquer 3, then conquer 4, then 5, then 6, then 7, then 8. Theoretical course up.

One of these auditors I remember scolding severely for not using the next - what is now the next-to-the-last list of Self Analysis, "Remember something real."

What is the theoretical course down? It's an inverted course which starts at 8 and dwindles down to 1 - would be the descent of the person.

Every once in a while I run into this. It's utterly maddening. How an auditor can take somebody who is a bit adrift and not make this simple test - knowing the test, knowing it is in existence and knowing it is workable - I'm sure I don't know.

Now, let me make that much more clearly. You've got your inverted cone and it runs from the middle: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 up. Got that? Now, your thetan, in getting in here, has gone from the top of that top cone: 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1. There's his course of degeneration, down to a point of a fairly-good-order, pretty-good-shape Homo sapiens, really. He's still got a little bit of this stuff kicking around on the rest of the dynamics but he's downdrifting in that field. All right.

But in this particular case, that test should have been used - oh, but thoroughly should have been used. He could have put in just hours and hours and hours and hours of the same list, just as it came out in 1951.

Now, let's take this fellow as he goes down scale from Homo sap, into Homo sap in bad shape. He starts inverting: from 1 he departs out into 2. I was telling you about this the other day - can't survive. Can't survive on 1, therefore he starts to the lower 2. Can't survive on sex or children, he decides, so he goes to the 3. That'd be part of a group organism - communist or something.

And there's another thing in 1951, the other technique released - maybe you remember this, but I remember training two of these auditors in this. You put up - you have the preclear put his hand up in front of his face and feel the force of his words. And if he's above 2.0 or thereabouts on the Tone Scale, he of course recognizes immediately that there is no force in words. There isn't any force.

Most communists have failed sexually, by the way. I don't mean to damn the Communist Party by that remark. That happens to be a clinical observation.

The second I had this preclear do that, she got explosions. Now, this says a great deal - this says a real great deal for these boys, doesn't it?

Then when he gets down to 3, they're perfectly willing to sit around home and chew up other Russians until all of a sudden they drop into 4 and then we've got to internationalize.

Their acceptance level, obviously, must have been on well people. It just must have been, that's all, because this is too obvious.

Then we drop below that and we get to 5. It's animals, then.

Now we come out with a technique: "What room?" "What room?" I've been talking about this for a long time - talked about it at the conference. But this preclear refused to have this run on her because it was a psychotic technique. And yet when she just touched one side of this room and walked across this room to the other side of the room and was asked, "Now, is this at a distance from the wall which you just handled just before you touched the wall you're now touching?"

Then he goes down - 6. That's just MEST.

"Oh, yes. Yes, a different wall."

You see, he's losing out. You might call this the gradient scale downward of anesthesia. He loses everything above the level in which he's operating.

"How do you know?"

Now he loses 6 and goes into 7 and there is your psychotic band. They've lost 6 and are moving into 7. And man, the way he is now - the way he shouldn't be now, the composite that is modern Homo sapiens - markedly, just markedly, hangs around these two points. Way down! He's below an inverted 6, moving into 7 and then he moves into 8.

"Because I can see the facsimile of a wall I just touched right in front of my face."

Well, how the hell do you get this guy to turn around and go back up the other way? Fortunately, you don't progress the case mathematically or arithmetically or by diagrams. This is just a method of demonstrating to you what's happening.

We go across the room again and touch the radiator; make sure it's real. And we come across to the other side of the room, touch the wall again. "Now, what did you touch just before you walked across the room?"

So you find this guy in the insane asylum who thinks he's God.

"Radiator."

By the way, your Tone Scale there begins with 8 at 0.0 and runs up with 1 at 20.0. (I was wrong before. I said that's a Homo sapiens. I keep thinking that man is optimum, in pretty damn good condition.) He's at 20.0, at where you got those is crossed, and he's at 40.0 when he's up to the upper 8. This would be another way of graphing your Tone Scale. Come down at 20.0 and from 20.0 your dynamics invert and go lower. Seven and 8 are down there below 2.0. And 2.0 - a little bit in advance of 2.0 - is 6. It's just a little bit up from 2.0. See?

"How do you know?"

I'm just mulling this over here a little bit to make it plainer and plotting it against the Tone Scale. And when you'd go up, let's see, your level of comparison there, he'd be - it must be a DEI sort of an inversion. There's - he's got gradient scales of each one of these. It's a more complex graph, by far, than what I'm demonstrating to you but should get this idea - just get the idea of the two cones and you've got it. It's a terrific number of small cones which makes two big cones.

"I-I see this facsimile of it right in front of my face."

All right. We get here the psycho in the insane asylum who's being God. And then we get the psycho in the insane asylum who's being Christ. He's not quite as bad off as the psycho being God. See? He's inverted. He's out through the bottom to the extent that he as a thetan is going to be God.

"Well now where is the radiator which you just touched?"

You say, "Be three feet back of your head." If he was in communication at all, he would merely tell you he was God right now, see? Huh! There wouldn't be any uncertainty about it - he knows! He is convinced; you should be, too.

"Right here in the facsimile."

You run into this every once in a while but the clue is, is he is nowhere near his body in the first place and he'd have to be processed to come back into his body and out of his body again in order to give you the exteriorization which we want. It's symptomatic that he says, "I'm over there."

People have been trying to run engrams on this case. People have been trying to run all sorts of things on this case.

Now, because that's a long way to climb doesn't mean it's a long way to process; it breaks quickly. But he says as a thetan - anywhere down from about an inverted 3 - he'll tell you, "I'm over there." See? "My thetan..." he will say. See? And people who are really sold on religion talk about "our God."

The condition of a psychotic is so heroic, so bloody, so terrible, that of course it follows immediately by Q and A that one can only use, then, heroic, bloody and terrible techniques, doesn't it? And yet these are the people that have to be processed with a powder puff. Oh, how lightly. Oh, how lightly.

Religion, as you know it in the Christian church, is well in the vicinity of 0.0. It's really close to death. They talk about "their God." A little bit higher they talk about "their Christ."

But to show you how far you can go with a technique just as a case history: I actually had this person well exteriorized and blowing things up before I ran room contacts. A little bit rough at first but pushed her right on through it.

Well, what's God in this case? It's themselves. But you've got to go all the way up through the dynamics to find him. You can't go out and walk around geographically trying to locate, yourself, your own God because you are your own God. It's so simple. You can't walk around all over the place trying to "find Christ" or "put Christ in your heart" or some such thing as that, because as far as you're concerned, you're - when you got to a straight up 7, you'd be it - you'd be Christ. Do you get the idea?

Now, this person is a cat person. There's some of that in the Doctorate tapes. There's seventeen or so races which have come down to us. There's the snake people. There's the bear people, the cat people. There's a dog people. These things key in simply on animals and the only reason we're calling them cats, birds, dogs, bears, snakes, something like that, is because that's as close as you come down here. There's a canary people. We just have a word and the word says "canaries" - it's not canaries. But it's something that vaguely resembles Earth canaries so there's your key-in.

And this case was a cat person. With explosions and with actual room techniques, I changed the color and expression of this person's eyes. Took me two and a half hours, but I changed the color of her eyes from almost washed-out blue to hazel brown. So I knew I'd effected a communication change.

Little higher on the Tone Scale they use this God to Christianize them, like they got slaves over in Africa, you know? You think for a moment that I'm using blasphemy. I'm not. These are the people that are using blasphemy. They are doing the only crime that you can do: They are denying themselves. And that is the only crime possible. That is the only cross-up of ethics possible. After mulling it over and turning it over and testing it for a long time, why, I finally found that out that the only unethical thing you can do is deny yourself.

Now, here is an acute state of energy scarcity, which is space scarcity, which manifests itself on what we call an "inverted dynamic." And today we're going to talk about these inverted dynamics (and I was right on schedule). And this case doesn't particularly exemplify this, but this person on explosions began to tell me, "Yes, I'm right up there." Now, just get that phraseology again. "Yes! I know I'm exteriorized - I'm right over there in the corner." We follow this?

So, they've denied themselves to the point of saying, "God is out there and he made the universe." Oh no, he isn't. They made the universe and they're not out there; they're right here. This fellow's inverted; he's not in his body.

Boy, fan your ears for that on a preclear. Just fan your ears real well, because they're on an inverted dynamic. All right. Cover that later, but that's - that's terrific. That is just simply the best doggone psychometry you possibly could ever lay your hands on. That's Dianometry. That's Scientometry.

Now we come right back up the line, we don't find anybody in his body until we start getting up fairly high. See, we're going right on up the line thetawise.

Here we have a case that is so swimming around in personally generated energy, and she's dodging her own energy much more than she's dodging her own body or MEST objects. Yet, this case is still moving, walking straight up and doing pretty well. Doing pretty darned good.

But fortunately the very act of saying, "Be three miles or three light-years or ten feet back of your head" - the very act of saying this is - the sudden recognition of it, if the guy exteriorizes (pow) at all, he jumps, quite ordinarily, up the Tone Scale a number of rungs. He goes up fast if he exteriorizes like this. And he goes up fast the more certainty he obtains on exteriorization because - pow! pow! pow! Q and A - the riddles of existence are just fading out on him at a mad rate. Just real fast!

Computation on the case is, of course - I look at the case - cat people. She was auditing people at a distance: other people's problems. See what the computations are? How fast they come out? Why cat people? Her eyes look like cat's eyes, that's all.

That's why Theta Clearing produces the results it does. It's like shooting somebody up the Tone Scale with a rocket. And yet, they apparently don't shoot up the Tone Scale because their body is right there, isn't it? And it didn't suddenly glow or do anything. Well, here you've got measuring whether or not the thetan got into better condition by observing the flesh which he inhabited. That isn't very reasonable but an auditor is liable to do that if he doesn't recognize that he's liable to do that.

Well, how do cat's eyes look? They look just like a cat's eyes and you don't have to stretch your imagination a doggone bit. They're not necessarily the color of cat's eyes, but if you'll notice a cat's eyes sort of sweep up. The shape of the outer lid - that is to say, the lid of the eye, the amount of eyeball exposed - it's long and slitty and swept up at the end. Very recognizable.

In other words, we exteriorize the fellow, he will manifest physical changes. Oh yes, he will! But it'll take a little while, maybe, for the physical changes to catch up to him. The body doesn't change fast.

I know four or five of these cases that are very extreme - keyed way in. Well, all these cat people have about the same computation, so it's awful easy. They - any adventure, misadventure they had with a cat when young - oh, there's a beautiful explanation for why they are cat people. And they had trouble with Papa and cats, or Mama and cats, inevitably and invariably.- It should strike you as rather strange that practically everybody has the same sort of incident but it only keys in on one person.

Horses, for instance, when raised in the lowlands of Persia, where it's very hot, grow short hair. And when made - pushed into the mountains where long hair is very desirable, still don't grow any for three generations. And horses who have long hair in the mountains, when put down in the plains, keep that darned long hair for about three generations. They just want to make sure they're on a lower plain.

So don't-don't-don't get - don't - I know none of you would do this, but don't let some auditor you're training get super, super brilliant, let him draw this fantastic conclusion that the incident about the cat is the incident for which he's searching and is an incident, and that these people who are fascinated with cats and so forth... A cat person isn't necessarily fascinated with cats. They practically never talk about cats unless you push them. That's the difference between people who are just enamored with cats and cat people.

Well, that's the body. And it gives you an index of how close it's contacting MEST and how fast it's willing to change. It's not willing to change fast at all. It wants to change real slow - generation by generation, if possible. It doesn't like this "five-minute alteration complete."

If this character, this auditor, dreams this up as an explanation, he will then run the incident and hang the case up on the track the like of which you never saw anything hung up on a track. A cat person will hang up on a track when the childhood cat incident is run. Now, you can think this is very, very strange, but the cat involved and the cats involved don't happen to be Earth cats. They are flying cats. And you can run flying cats on these people and it's quite shocking to them, to say the least.

One of you the other day coming in and complaining a little bit after a certain amount of processing - a certain physiological change took place connected with the pineal gland. That right? Well, there was no complaint about it. It's just a fact that the body is not accustomed to a sudden endocrine shift.

But they all have an incident whereby Papa drowned cats, Mama killed cats or they strangled cats. And when looked for, you find this incident and there it is and there - leave it alone. Just leave it alone. It's just a key-in. And if they're down the groove on this at all, they've got so much past history on it and it has happened so often and there are so many incidents under it and it will so confuse them to run it, they're in no condition to run it. There you go.

I can tell you how to shift the body's endocrine system around madly. You just use Rising Scale Processing with the Chart of Attitudes. How simple. You do this on some girl - if you did this on an eleven-year-old girl you would probably shoot her up into the age of puberty in an awful rush. You'd probably change her physiologically and speed up the whole process.

A cat people, unlike the snake people - snake people are unauditable, practically, because they sort of slither around everything you say and do. They're very, very unmistakable people.

You do this on a girl who is much older and her endocrine system will turn back on again. You can change the body all over the place.

Well, you know, I'm talking to you here you think very seriously about these kinds and brands of people and you might, therefore, do well just to simply memorize all these people - this isn't the point. It doesn't matter whether there is such a thing as a cat tribe that got imported into this universe or not. But the computation is the reverse computation of the cat.

But the point I'm trying to make is that the body is conservative and the thetan isn't. All the thetan has to do to change is just change his mind. But as long as he's evaluating according to the body, he thinks he has to change the body before he can change as a thetan.

The cat's computation is "Oh, how independent we have to be." There is nothing quite as contemptuously independent as a cat. And there is nothing so frantically helpful as a cat person. They do not bear that personality characteristic. Call them cat people just because they have eyes like cats. All right.

Well, you're just doing this job: You're trying to get him into the body so you can get him out. This is a hell of a note, isn't it? It's an inverted proposition. You're trying to get him into the body before you can get him out.

"Other people's problems”, you’ve seen that. That's quite a button. Well, when it becomes the case computation, thoroughly, a hundred percent, you realize that somebody must be trying to atone or pay for something which is impossible to pay for. And it's just hopeless. These poor cat people. However they got into this universe I don't know. But they're completely lost. They're completely helpless. They are utter final bait for anybody who wants to clip them or gyp them or swindle them - they're trying to help. And if you were to tell a cat person that he or she couldn't help, they'd spin. Just like a spinning top, away they go.

Well, processes show up and are quite evident immediately as to how you get somebody who is way downscale, as far as a thetan is concerned - he might be downscale as a body and upscale as a thetan, but still the body kicking back against the thetan could make him outside the body before he gets into it.

You tell any psychotic that he can't help, if you don't find something for him to do, oh boy, you're liable to just pull the string on him. He's gone - round and round and round and round.

You'll find some thetans working this mock-up from clear up in outer space someplace. You'll find other ones stuck thoroughly in a theta trap. I mean this physically. I don't mean this in a mock-up form. They're actually in some kind of a trap someplace or they're in a room or they're standing in front of an electronic switchboard or something, way the hell and gone out of here! Nothing to do with it!

I've seen three of them have psychotic breaks immediately following a hint from me that they couldn't help. So, after these things happen, and so on, I always find something for them to do. This is no clue to it at all, but I always tell them to do something. But remember, you don't have to be sequitur with such - such a case level, you don't have to be sequitur When they say, "Help," you just define help for them right then and there. And the best way for them to help is ____, and then you just define it. I don't care what you tell them to do. Make sure that people don't get parking meters overstuffed or overtime; have some nickels in their pockets when they walk down the streets and put them in parking meters for people whose parking meters have run over. Anything! Anything. Anything at all.

I ran across a preclear one day, had constant ringing in his ears. Ring, ring, ring, ring, ring, ring, all the time, all the time, all the time and nothing, no process known to man, would change this thing until all of a sudden I said, "Well, why don't you move away from the dynamo?" His body didn't go anyplace, but he just simply moved away from the dynamo. He ran into the guy who was standing behind him. This caused him to look down at his hands and feet, at which moment he immediately got sick at his stomach, they were so horrible. He'd been standing there looking at a view screen! He's been there for a long time.

Tell them that the best movement in the country is the Boy Scouts or the Girl Scouts and the best thing they can do is go and take Dianetics or Scientology or something into that group or troupe or something. But give them something to do, for God's sakes! Just don't leave them standing there, because they'll - they'll spin on you.

I just shoved him off because I moved his position away from the view screen and out away from that and then processed him around for a while, then got him to finally sever the communication lines and then pick up direct lines with the body.

You say, "Well, there isn't anything you can do here, really," so on and so on. Away they go. Wham-wham! Bad deal.

I had to run Hand Flopping, a wonderful little technique called Hand Flopping, up to a point where he finally realized that he was controlling the body. Realization! You didn't run it as long as - enough to get the complete realization of it, but "Who's controlling this body?" You run it with that thought. You get your hands flopping up and down and just suddenly - just keep thinking "Who's controlling this body? Who's making these hands do this?" Flop, flop, flop, flop, flop, flop, flop, flop, flop, and all of a sudden it'll dawn on you with tremendous certainty, "I am!" You see? I mean, that's good stuff. That's a real good little technique, by the way.

Conversely, you could take one in a terribly bad spin and if you had them in an emergency area of some sort or other where work was actually going forward like a hospital or insane asylum, if you just suddenly said to one of them, "Here! Give me a hand calming this fellow down!" They'd just snap sane right then. They'd probably stay sane. It takes an emergency situation to give them that much juice suddenly.

Now, what's the condition here? The condition is the guy has run away from his body; he's run away from bodies; he can't even be in a body.

Well, all right, I got away with processing out Papa and cats by not processing Papa and cats. I just simply had her blow up men and women and herself and cats and then I had her holding cats and the cats were cursing her. And they were going to get even with her and she had to throw them out away from her and have them explode. And she'd get another cat - she'd produce this new cat - and the cat would curse her and say he was going to get even and she'd throw him out and explode. Well, she really was grooving down the line on this, see? She blew up more doggone cats than you can count.

The value of the body is so great that they don't even dare come near one. That's very true. They don't even dare come near one; they might hurt it. And so they're running them on extensional lines or some doggoned fool thing. At least this is the way they're computing. Regardless of what they're doing or what they think they're doing, you have to come up through a solid 6.

And in the process of this, I ran another technique I'll tell you about, whereby you get something to create something to create something to create something. The Quaker Oats technique, we call it - the mock-up within the mock-up within the mock-up within the mock-up. You know on those - some breakfast food boxes, you see a picture of the breakfast food box on the box of breakfast food. And it's got on it a picture and that's got a picture of a box of breakfast food on it and it runs on, on down. I think several artists have gone psychotic trying to get in the last box of breakfast food in the pictures.

You'll find them kicking around with spirits. You'll find wasting ghosts on some of these people is very effective. Wasting God, wasting ghosts, wasting spirits, wasting Christ and they'll start picking right on up the line. Or you simply do the processes which I've already been giving you and they accomplish the same thing.

Anyway, here we have this case, which is just bank completely starved for energy. And yet under good auditing, energy was under complete obedience. So we found another - found a prime button, "Afraid to get old." And if you add this up, you'll realize what a button that is. It's in a lot, in fact, the majority of old people. How do you know it is? Because they go psychotic. How do they go psychotic? They turn into senility. They've been pushing the time track and locking themselves up in time so hard that they push themselves back into childhood and restimulate it so that they won't be old. Fighting age, fighting time. Time is the single aberration. Okay.

The best of those processes, by the way, although it takes a while when run on a low-toned case, is Step II of SOP 8 - that's real good -

Let's - let's see how we do this. All right. We blow up old people. We blow up old people and we blow up old people's voices and we blow up old people's sight and we blow up their hearing and we blow up their teeth. These - you know, teeth is one of the most intimate communication perceptions a person has - crunch! Very intimate.

& You can practically drive somebody psycho with that if you rush it too hard or press it too hard,

Anyway, just keep blowing these up, see, in big quantity, way up in space and so on.

- by having them move the mock-up and have them move the body and move the mock-up and then have them advance the mock-up and retreat from the mock-up, but bring the mock-up with them, you know? Keep the same distance and advance and retreat and so forth.. But the time to stop that is not when they're still groggy. You just keep it up. You just keep rolling it. You keep them walking forward toward the mock-up and the mock-up walking back with them until you've finally got this setup.

Well, before I'd done very... And then - then we turn around and we have little children in mobs with this great determination in them that they're going to grow up. And of course that's what's the maybe. For the first part of a person's life, he's got to be old. For the last part of a person's life, he's got to be young. And between these two when they lock up on the complete maybe you get senility. Okay.

Now, there's an extension on SOP 8, by the way, which is creating something which creates which creates. And I'll go into that in a moment.

Blew this up and what do you know? She was saying, "Well, we were five thousand feet up, see." And here she was saying, "Yeah, the mock-up is right out in front of me. And there's a platform under it. I've got this platform under it and there's this and there's that and so forth and ..."

But you get what I mean by an inverted dynamic. The fellow is so dispersed, he is so scattered around, he's below the level of being in a body. Now, let's not labor this. This is not serious. It simply explains to you the condition under which some of your preclears are operating up to the time you process them.

In other words, by the time we'd done what I've just described to you in various ways, and done nothing else but this, we had this person actually exteriorized. What do you know! They weren't exteriorized and detached from the exteriorization. They weren't on the - in other words, we'd inverted the dynamic. They were - this person was five thousand feet up, see?

SOP 8 is the method of processing them - and its ramifications as I'm giving them to you here. There are lots of ramifications and there are lots of faster processes, too. But the point is, the guy you're trying to exteriorize, when he doesn't exteriorize, isn't in the body. You've asked him to do an impossible thing. He's already exteriorized as far as he's concerned. He's either some other thetan or he's some other demon or he's someplace else and he wouldn't be able to come near the body on a bet.

They weren't here saying that - here over to the left - saying that the thetan is five thousand feet up having exteriorized it from the body. See, they are exteriorized already! Then they have to take something out of the body and send it five thousand feet up, see, and audit it. But this person really exteriorized and pam! went into valence as herself and was considerably easier and the color of her eyes flicked suddenly; it was quite an amazing sight. Her eyes kept going kind of flickery and all of a sudden - pow-pow!

You got what we mean by an inverted dynamic. What is the "anesthese" level of the preclear? What can he communicate with? If he can communicate with MEST, you've got him at the level of inverted 6. If he can only communicate with spirits, only communicate with spirits and all else is kind of unreal and dull to him, you've got him at inverted 7. If he can only commune with God and all else is strictly mock-up, he's an inverted 8. It's "Where can he communicate?"

And one of the techniques I use which I omitted there was I had her blowing up eyes - just lots of eyes. When she first tried to put up two eyes they kept slapping together, naturally - double terminal. But eventually got her blowing up eyes in tremendous quantity. "Eventually" - within three minutes. All right - from the moment she first began to have trouble with eyes to blowing them up by the billions - individually, collectively. At first she couldn't blow up green eye - blue eyes; she could blow up brown eyes. And we blew up the brown eyes and we blew up the blue eyes. And her eyes were evidently trying to keep from being brown eyes or something of the sort, which accounted to some degree for the color shift. All right.

This person shouldn't be mistaken by you for two seconds! Because when I said, "He can only communicate with," that's what I meant. His communication level is so slight on the other dynamics, he wouldn't know groups or he wouldn't know anything about man at large or he'd be kind of foggy on the subject of animals. “Animals? Animals? Yes. Yes, animals are nice, aren't they? God made all these little animals" Here we go, see?

Then we finished up with completely objective techniques. Now, these techniques - any of these techniques, you see, are quite valid for any level of any case. But these objective techniques particularly so. And if you want to get a line charge on a pc, you follow this technique.

"Yes, women - women are very, very nice. Yes, yes. They're very - some - been very, very good women in the world. Take Mary Magdalene!" Here we go, see? Now we're in communication.

How about you standing? You're handiest there, John.

How do you know you're in communication? Because he talks with certainty on the subject. Savvy? So simple. That's diagnosis, if you want it that way.

Now stand up over by the window and look inboard toward a spot here. Now you say to the spot here, "How are you?"

Now you could also plot this thing out horizontally and say: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, with an up and lower cone for each one of the numerals. And you could handle the problem, each dynamic individually, although they tend to pin each other down a bit. But you could just handle each dynamic individually. You could just strike into the problem. Anyplace you wanted to strike into any preclear, you'll find dynamics 1 to 8. And treat each one as an upper 8 or a lower 8, an upper 5 or a lower 5.

Male voice: Mm-hm.

Let's just start in with a preclear willy-nilly and say, "He can't communicate with animals, obviously." Here we go, see? He can't communicate with animals. Let's - you just assume this that he's - there'll be something wrong with his communication with animals. And you might find that his ability to communicate with animals is pretty damn good and a hell of a lot better than the rest of the men around him, but he still can't talk to them. He still can't walk up to a horse and say, "How are you?" See what I mean about communication with animals? He can't walk up to a dog and say, "Hey, gee, there's a swell - there is just a swell fireplug down in the next block. Rover was by there a half an hour ago. I just passed the place." You get what I mean by "communicate with animals?"

Well say it!

Now let's take "communicate with MEST." This stuff do what you want it to do? Damned seldom. A fellow who can't work is simply hung up on 6. He's on inverted 6 - the lower part of 6.

Male voice: How are you?

Now, if you plot your case, then, with the second system I mentioned, you have a case plot which is beautiful to behold. You just work that case plot with Creative Processing on creation and destruction by explosion. Mock-ups! Your case will solve itself. Do it by gradient scales.

I don't know. Come over here. Turn around and face the window and refuse to answer. Okay, go back there.

You can't blow up the cat? Well, by golly, you can blow up the duplicate you made of the cat by taking a stray hair which has already been pulled out, which is on the cat's back, out of the duplicate. And holding it out at a distance from both the duplicate and the cat, blowing up that hair. You can always do that. You can finally get down to where you can blow up the tail of the duplicate cat and then you finally blow up the mock-up of the cat. Now, we can take dogs, animals, crocodiles, any doggone thing you want on a gradient scale with Creative Processing and this technique is wide open.

Turn around and face this spot again and say, "What's wrong with you?"

You just sit down and do this. Say, "Well, we've got this technique and all we do is write down on a piece of paper in a horizontal line: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8. And we draw a cone up and a cone down from each one of those numerals. And we'll find his lowest level of dynamic in an awful rush. We'll find out where he's the worst off simply by asking him questions connected with it." And where you find him in communication is when he alerts and starts to talk to you.

Male voice: What's wrong with you?

I remember processing a preacher one time. Nobody had ever been able to do anything with this fellow. He was in pretty bad shape, actually. He had enough people around him in bad shape and in misery and broke and so forth, but after forty years of it, by Q and A, he was at last miserable, in bad shape and broke.

All right. Now refuse to answer it.

So, this wasn't an inevitable fate. It merely shows that the environment determined him, he didn't determine the environment. So we got - the preacher and I talked about himself and outside of being miserable, he didn't have anything to say about himself. I mentioned the subject of sex and a sort of an imbecilic thought that this was something evil flicked through his mind but that was about all. I talked to him about his parish and his parish didn't even vaguely worry him anymore. "They do not weep and neither do they spin," or something of the sort - way off beam. Talked to him about material objects, things he owned and so forth - way out of communication. And I talked to him about Christ and he showed a little bit of animation. He said, "Well, of course, he couldn't really have been a man. He must have been more of an idea that God sent here."

All right, go back over there again. Now look at this spot here and say, "You've got to answer me!"

Ha-ha! And here we go. Now, I said, "Well now, concerning God..."

Male voice: You've got to answer me!

"Yes," he says.

Turn around. Now say, "What do you want to know?"

"Do you often have a feeling that he smiles upon you or you're in his presence?"

Male voice: What do you want to know?

"Well, you have to be really rather careful, you see, in your concourse with God, because it might be damaged by some sordid thought."

All right. Go over there again.

Poor guy was already beginning to worry about the only Comm line he had left, which was God. You give him about thirty more seconds on the hour hand that man uses for a life span and he just would have slipped overboard and nobody would even notice the splash, including himself.

Male voice: This is driving me ragged. I'm wearing out.

All right. Here's an analysis of a case. But this could be the analysis of any case.

Say - just say, "Are you all right?"

You talk to this girl and you say, "Yourself?"

Male voice: Are you all right?

“Ahn-ah-nah."

Now say, "I'm fine now that you started talking to me”.

"Sex?"

Male voice: I'm fi ... Yeah. Yeah. I'm fine now that you started talking to me.

"Nah-rar-r."

Okay, that's - that's - this technique, it just goes on along this line.

"Groups?"

Okay, this is - demonstrates to you that you can very closely approximate mock-up Q and A on this line and it just works beautifully. Okay.

"Ah-nrr-well, you know - groups."

Now, did this, and came right on up the line.

"Man?"

Well, anyway, the techniques not to run on this case - actually, one was taking a chance by running explosions, because one saw that obviously we had an inverted dynamic. This case is not what you would call psychotic - not even vaguely. The case is on a balance, however, between what you might call "Theta universe" and this universe, to a point where the body - it's much more easier to substitute a mock-up for the body - you know, give the mock-up more validity than the body.

"Well, yes. Yes, somebody should do something for that."

Now, this case could be in terrifically bad condition and most cases, in that case's boots, are in bad condition. This case happened to be moving very, very well for this condition.

Talk to her about animals. "I had the cutest cat once!" Here we go! She's on inverted 5. Just like that - pang!

Now, an invalidation of the case had occurred which blew off in several different auditing sessions. And the invalidations were just the basis "Oh, that technique is too much for you." She wanted to run a certain technique, so - so on. "That technique is too much for you."

She still conceives herself to be in such strong communication with 6, 7 and 8 that she doesn't worry about it. But she's got the cutest cat and the cat got sick one day... You get where you'll spot a case now?

And she came up to me, really, to find out whether or not she was all right. I told her she was all right and she was. Felt lots better. People had been worrying her.

Now, what's the fastest way to process the case? is pick up the last inverted dynamic - the highest inverted dynamic you can find with which he's still in communication and rehabilitate it. Have you got it?

Now, but this is an interesting session just from that basis. It took a long time to run from a basis of just time - two and a half hours' worth of auditing on this sort of thing and yet we were auditing with pretty good rapidity.

Now, you'll find people in Scientology that have moved into Scientology on an inverted 7. You guys aren't on an inverted 7. You swung in through here on probably an inverted 3 or 4, which is terrifically high for man.

Gave this technique: The idea of the hand across the mouth and I had her say - oh yes, there was another technique I used - I had her say, "The terrible force of words" against her hand. And she agreed with me completely, "Yes, her words had a terrible force." She could feel them, right there. How do you like that? She never did get to the point where words did not have a terrible force because this case is running on a computation where she backs up every word with an energy flow. And she's sufficiently crossed up in universes that when she speaks, she speaks with beams to the mock-up of the person she has made to substitute for the mock-up of the person. Interesting, huh?

People condemn Dianetics and Scientology and say we've got a lunatic fringe! Sure we got a lunatic fringe; you bet your life. But do you know the only people interested in this, really, are an intellectual strata which number probably, I'm afraid, amongst the first five or ten thousand in the United States. You know there are only about ten to fifteen thousand intellectuals in this country? That's a horrible fact, isn't it? But it's true enough. I've checked it up often enough.

So, of course, the terrible force of words was definitely there. And every time she would speak like that she would blow the mock-up up. She couldn't keep it from blowing up; she was having a bad time with it. So I had her put her fingers on her windpipe and feel the vibration of the windpipe with her fingers and she finally straightened out very well on that. She blew that and then I ran some Comparison.

All right, you're real high toned. You swing in on an inverted 4.

But I ran another technique - a live technique, that is to say, not a mock-up technique - having her run this - none of these are psychotic techniques; these are just techniques - I had her say, "Dirty word" and then rush - jump out of the chair and - I'll show you.

Did you ever see the terrific sentimentality which is showered by armies on animals? And the amount of Christ that armies buy? They sure do. Your army varies; there's some real tough cookies in there that don't care from nothing, but the rank and file of the army is on an inverted 5 somewhere. They live like dogs, they feel like dogs, they speak like dogs, they love dogs and the name for a soldier in many languages is "dogface" or "dog soldier."

Sit right there.

Male voice: Devil dogs.

Turn your chair around. You - get your chair now. Turn your chair sideways.

Devil dogs. We've always got animals tied up in here.

Okay. Now say, "Dirty word." Sit down in your chair. Now say, "Dirty word."

The army mule, so forth. Always got something like this.

Male voice: Dirty word.

The navy - hell, they're hopeless. Nobody could place them anywhere. They've gone past God. They're on an inverted 12. They're always talking about letting things go to hell. The standard phrase of the navy is to let things go to hell. "Yeah, they let everything go to hell and we've caught it," and so forth. It's real terrific. Interesting.

Now reach out and grab it.

All right. There is the handiest "Scientometry" I know, because that is "Scientometry" if you don't mind my coining the word. I mean that word jokingly, by the way. But that is, in Scientology, case diagnosis for exteriorization.

Male voice: Ho-ho! Like that?

You're not interested in aberration. You're not interested in quirks. You're not interested in words. You're not interested in whether he can get mock-ups. You're not interested in any God's number of things on the thing.

Yeah. And say, "It'll betray me."

Now you know what I'm talking about when I'm talking about A, B, C, D, E, F, G and tell you that it's not analogous to Steps I, II, III, IV, V, VI, VII. Actually, these steps are Arabic numeral - you know, we've got Roman numeral for the steps - and the actual index, where you slip over into the technique, is inverted 1, inverted 2, inverted 3, inverted 4, inverted 5, inverted 6, inverted 7, inverted 8.

Male voice: It'll betray me.

We've got no technique for 8 because there's no communication with 8. They're dead. Except what communication in life you yourself are willing to install in the person by manual contact or by artificial communication factors. Now, I've worked on these and when I say there isn't any technique in SOP 8 for 8, I am stretching the point too far. There is a mechanical technique at level 8 and we'll cover that in this course. But it's none of our damned business right here. Okay?

Now hide it.

We then slide over from the step which we exteriorized them on and watch whether or not their communication line goes up or down and slide into that letter step as I told you before. But that letter step is a dynamic number - Arabic. A is 1, B is 2, and so on, and a complete process.

Male voice: I hid it.

Any time you'd get stalled down you have several processes. Please hear me. You have several processes.

Hide it!

The best of these processes is next-to-the-last list of Self Analysis in Scientology and Self Analysis in Scientology. You've always got that technique. It isn't that we just wearily give up and so we use this technique. It actually is a technique that'll feed the bank of a neurotic or psychotic up to a point where he can actually be processed. Up to that point, he's got communication lines which are so tightly taut that he can't get them stretched enough to blow a lock.

Male voice: Oh!

If I knew a good, fast, handy way of pumping these fellows full of better energy I would tell it to you. Self Analysis is the easiest. You always got that at any level of case. You can always say Self Analysis in Scientology. Any group - you can count on the fact that the people in the group are going to get good results rather uniformly.

Physically.

You may even get some miracle results but the chances of you getting miracle results are slighter than in Six Steps to Better Beingness. But your chances of getting uniform results throughout the group are much greater by the use of the lists of Self Analysis.

Male voice: Okay, I'll put it in my pocket.

Now, you can improve those to be past, present and future tense and you've got a terrific package right there.

That's all right. Put it in your pocket. Now say, "Dirty word" again.

Well now, on diagnosis we've got Create and Destroy on all those dynamics. Maybe for the first time you make it completely usable to you. You don't have to depend upon the flick of an E-Meter but it's very handy to have as you go down these dynamics. Just find out where the fellow goes into communication, that's all. Solve the problem at that level and you will bring him enough closer to being interior to be exteriorized.

Male voice: Dirty word. You want me to grab it?

You have to bring them in to get them out and that's the motto. And that ranks with "Thinking is condensed feeling," or "Feeling is condensed looking," and two or three others I have given you. You have to get them in to get them out.

And say, "It'll betray me."

When you find yourself getting sort of groggy about a case and you don't quite know what to do with a case; when your tendency is to reach over with a beam and yank them out of their heads, blow up their ridges, throw one through each ear; bring them down in a wonderful crash to produce an effect of somehow or other; just remember that you've got to get them in to get them out. And if you can get them out, why, gee, they go up Tone Scale - poom!

Male voice: It'll betray me.

Well, how do you get them out? Well, you get them in first. Well, how do you get them in? Just look at the case and do a diagnosis on 1 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8. Where is he in communication?

And hide it. Now, say that again.

People here are trained now. Two or three are looking at me hauntedly and thinking, "I wonder - I wonder if there's an inverted 10."

Male voice: Dirty word. This can go here.

But you'll find out that horizontally, as you go across the boards with the upper cone and the lower cone on each numeral you'll find out that this is a much fairer rating. Actually, they're just a little bit inverted down on all the dynamics.

Well, when you catch it out there, say, "It'll betray me."

Now, why do we use inverted and up cones? Why, huh? Because the fellow is introverted on that dynamic. You can go along and find out where a person is introverted exactly and exteriorize him from there.

Male voice: Oh, yes. Dirty word. It'll betray me.

You want to know why your thetan doesn't have magnificent perceptics the moment he steps out of the body and why he's - very often sees a facsimile or sees a ridge instead of looking at the room? It's simply a problem of inverted and straight-up cones. That's all. It's just a problem of it. He is not doing well on 6 and he's on an inverted 6.

Say it again.

Now, don't expect that it's this mechanically mathematical. It is not. But it's not a very complex problem either And this mechanical or mathematical schema - schema - shift into German ...

Male voice: Oh, this is goofy! Dirty word. It'll betray me. I'm getting my pockets full. Some more?

& on it; I wish I could speak German and go over to Germany and raise hell with the Russians. Anyway, that's a good randomity. Boy, it's sure going to waste. I'm wasting randomity these days like mad. Anyway, when he drops here; there was a traffic cop down on the corner a few minutes ago and I didn't bop him. Boy, do I waste randomity.

Go ahead.

Just look at that; recognize we're having a little rough time with this case. This case looks all right. This case seems to get good mock-ups. This case seems to do this. It seems to do that. Don't go adrift, please. If you don't do this and you can't find out, you've got Self Analysis. You've got Six Steps to Better Beingness. They don't apply to psycho cases; they're too strong for a psycho case.

Male voice: Hm. Dirty word. It'll betray me. Dirty word. It'll betray me.

So you've got these last resorts. You've just got, well, "Sit and hold the two back corners of the room and don't think." That's sometimes too much for a VI or a VII, but you could risk it, very easily. And you've got this straight up and introverted dynamic. Test for that. Talk to the preclear and listen to what he says.

Go ahead.

Sometime you will get - you will get just what I mean when I say, "Get communication from the preclear. Get communication in from the preclear," because very few auditors bother to. They don't ask the preclear what's happening or they'd find out some of the damnedest things.

Male voice: Dirty word.

I've seen an auditor sit and process a preclear that I knew the preclear was just going round and round and round in squirrel cages, the like of which had never been drawn or designed by Walt Disney. And the auditor was confidently proceeding and was getting noplace. The preclear failed to get a mock-up five mock-ups ago. While still obeying the auditor with the new mock-ups, he doesn't know where that other mock-up is.

Now think the dirty word as you say "Dirty word" and make a substitute for it.

Now, do you mind if I mention something right here? Okay. I'm going to talk about - you said there was a third person, remember? Do you mind if I mention that?

Male voice: Oh, okay.

Male voice: No.

Think the dirty word.

And you - it won't influence your case if I tell you what it is, but I want to tell them what it is.

Male voice: I'm going to get all mixed up here.

Any time you get two mock-ups and a third one shows up, for Christ's sakes go back and read 16-G if you want the answer to this. The guy's certain there's a person standing out in front of him. He's been certain all along. He's been certain for years. So when you give him a chance to put two mock-ups, he knows there's another person out there. The person's been there all this time.

Come on.

And what do you run on this to get rid of that mock-up? Boy, you - if your case is not in an imbalance at all, what do you run?

Male voice: Dirty word. Nah, they won't betray me.

Male voice: That was three of me.

Okay. Go ahead.

Okay. Three of you. That's worse.

Male voice: Ahh! Neither will I.

He's got somebody standing out in front of him - that sure is. What is this? There's somebody standing in front of him. Isn't there?

Okay.

Well, you have him take a look at it and get awful interested in this sudden automatic mock-up that showed up. Get real interested because the case is parked with an extra body. And he's certain that the body's there, only the body isn't there.

Male voice: Dirty word. None of them will!

So you just run, "Certain that another one of me is present. Certain there's no other person present. Certain there's a person present. Certain there's no other person present," just like that out there in a bracket. If he's in good shape you can just get rid of it as a concept. Just pam! pam! pam! All of a sudden he'll say, "My God! My God! My God! My mother's been standing in front of me arguing now for about twenty years." Poof! Phooey! Pam! Mock up a half a dozen more mothers and blow them up. You can do anything you want to with it now, but after just running the concept and getting him to recognize the other.

Well! Turn around. None of them will, huh?

You talk about extroversion and introversion, where would be the preclear who was seeing an extra one of himself suddenly, automatically?

Male voice: No, none of them will.

Where?

Okay. Do it a couple more times.

Male voice: Introverted on 1.

Male voice: Trying to remember some more dirty words. Okay Dirty word. No, that one won't either.

That's right. He isn't in him. He's probably looking at his body! We'd say, "See? Mock-up - another mock-up."

Okay.

All sorts of possibilities show up from this, but an auditor could - has a technique instantly that he can apply there. All of a sudden there's an automaticity of another person. This simply means he's got a conviction there is somebody else in front of him there.

Male voice: Dirty word. Forgot to think of one.

All right. We just run the conviction "There is somebody there," and the conviction "There isn't somebody there," and we unlock it See how we unlock it? How easy; how easy. How simple.

Well, what do you know. Okay, skip it.

Don't run it very long. Don't run a limited technique like that very long because you get into hot water, of course. You start running it and you're running - thought-thought- thought-thought-thought-thought-thought-thought-thought.

A person down the line - thank you - a person down the line... Did you feel any pressure coming off in any fashion whatsoever? Did you?

All right. On this afternoon I want you to continue with your assignments but I want you to give some attention to this. I want you to satisfy yourself completely as to this: the objective reality on trying to stop the waves as they remove themselves from you so as to disclose you to somebody else.

Male voice: No, the only thing is that I just - the only thing was that I thought I might say one of them, and then I knew I wouldn't.

I want each of you under auditing, and so forth, to get an experience on that until you actually see it. It's all right to sit and watch somebody else do it and you laugh like hell, too, and everything is fine. But until you do it yourself you don't quite see what's happening here because it's funny because he finds it's funny. Well, that's different than a line charge.

Okay, now you know you won't.

[At this point on the reel there is a gap and the next section is labled "INVERTED DYNAMICS cont" 5310C14 1ACC-15B. Number 0668-B on the Flag Master List. The clearsound version continues without a break.]

Male voice: Yeah.

And this morning I gave you something to do on what? Gave you, the whole class, something to do - something to find out specially.

Well, you'd be surprised how far this would go with a person who is bad off. Every word they say they've got their hands mocked up, dancing in front of their mouth to grab the word and throw it away. They've got beams and things out in front of them to catch things that might - might slip, return them and put them away. They got all kinds of mock-up mechanisms by which anything which might betray them can be caught before it betrays them and then they can stow it. None of you are psycho. You don't appreciate this. But you'll see it. Words are objects to these people.

Male voice: Four parts.

This girl, as she did that, had the words exactly located geographically at the time she caught up with them and had to really stretch a couple of times to grab them because they were slipping through the wall. And then after a while sort of decided the same way, you know, "They're not going to betray me. Ha-ha!" That's the only certainty you're trying to reach.

Hm?

Well, that's a sane certainty. But that is the end product of psychoanalysis: "Words will betray you. We'll know all those vile and terrible things about which you're thinking. All we have to do is analyze what you're saying and you have betrayed yourself." It's just a typical MEST universe game. It has the same therapeutic value as the actual commodity which the betrayal represents. None! But it has a reverse value. It is destructive. Why is it destructive to have a person under inspection? Because he might betray himself so he's given the idea on Q and A that he has something which might be betrayed. Q and A, see?

Male voice: "Who did it?" "Reason for punishment."

Everybody is waiting for him to betray himself with a word, which gives him the idea that there is something in his past which he may betray to you. You follow that? Q and A. You manufacture, then, a guilt complex in the person and he doesn't know what he has done, but he knows he must have done something, because he obviously is betraying himself with his utterances and actions. Right?

Female voice: "Desire - desire for punishment."

So, we have manufactured a guilt complex about a no-incident. And the incident doesn't exist, so we leave the patient fighting a zero. We leave him fighting nothing in his past. He hasn't betrayed himself because there's nothing to betray in the past. Think this over. I see you're laboring on it. Your wheels are grinding.

Yeah. Go on.

Male voice: Has this ever been done for appearances as well as words?

Male voice: "Who's responsible?"

Oh, yes! Sure, I mean, you could...

Yes.

Male voice: Would you just have them mock up out there - a mock-up of appearances?

Female voice: The right to be nothing.

You don't mock up anything. You play it in real life if you possibly can manage it.

Okay. And what sudden stuff turned up on this? What convictions? Did anybody get any "bing" out of this?

Male voice: Well, what would you have the person do? Grab an object as an appearance and then...

Female voice: Very exteriorizing.

Ah, I see what you mean, yes. You don't - you don't run this in a mock-up.

Anybody get any bing on "the right to be nothing"?

What I'm trying to put home to you is, you would have - a pimply face - you'd have him put out an array of a pimply face and he reaches out and grabs that, see, and hides it. And he reaches out - and you have him put up the mock-up of a poor or cheap or shabby shirt - and he reaches out, see, and grabs that and hides that. You get the idea? And the whole thought is when he grabs it, he must think "It'll betray me." See?

Female voice: I don't think so.

And the other thought is somebody holding a pimply face or a shirt or a dirty word out there - they run right into this immediately, because they get the thing going out and returned, and they finally decide that if they do anything it'll be returned to them. So you bring them up track and then you'll decide people will hold it out on them. And that's ridicule. So you get pimply face, ridicule; cheap shirt, ridicule. Somebody is holding these items out there. "It betrayed me" is the thought which follows with that. Simple, supersimple technique. Idiotically simple.

Gee-whiz. Did you run it out?

The fact of the matter is, is everybody is putting out mock-ups all the time in terms of light waves. They can't help but put up these mock-ups in terms of light waves. And these mock-ups are consecutive and continuous and they're radiating out from their body in all directions, obviously, because other people are receiving them.

Male voice: Didn't run it.

So a person gets the idea he continues to put up this mock-up and he decides he doesn't want to put up this mock-up anymore so he goes into occlusion and won't put up mock-ups. You should get that real clear. You should drill on that until you've really got that.

Male voice: The auditor didn't plan it for the session.

Your face is putting up MEST universe patterns to somebody else, obviously, all the time. So therefore, you are putting out mock-ups which other people are grabbing. And they remember them so they hold them. And if other people keep telling you that they remember what you did or what you looked like - even if it's complimentary - it eventually will get on your nerves something fierce. Because it makes you aware of the fact that you're putting out a mock-up continuously and consecutively from your body out into the air and to the people around you, whatever else you're doing. So the obvious answer for this is try to keep from putting out a mock-up. In other words, become a priest and wear a cassock or something. No, what do they wear - hassocks?

Oh, you forgot about it.

Female voice: Cassocks.

Male voice: I did, yeah.

Male voice: Cassocks.

Ahhh!

Well, you don't put out a mock-up if you possibly can help it.

Male voice: That was an oversight.

This is the hooded, occluded figure, see? It doesn't want to put out a mock-up. And this is the better way: Every time he sees light, he ducks back in; he's using it like radar. At the same time he's also keeping light waves from putting out a mock-up. Follow? You've got to stop those light waves and keep them from putting out a mock-up.

Female voice: Yeah. it is..

The fact of the matter is you could do that, but that's why and how you got into one of the genuses of mock-ups: facsimiles. Because you don't want to put out a facsimile, so you stopped facsimiles of yourself from going out. See how that is? Because other people receive them and if they receive them and remember them, they are obviously holding them, so they have something of yours which they are holding and it's out away from you and you can't get it back.

Ahhh!

Auditors fall into a dramatization of this when they're trying to run out facsimiles from people. They're trying to wipe out the mock-ups they have made.

Female voice: ... a nagging feeling there was one of those missing.

I'm going to get my Argentinian whip. And if that doesn't work I'll get one of those bola things, you know? I mean, they've got a ball on each end of it and you throw it and it wraps around the neck.

They're not interested these auditors, at that level of the scale - they're not particularly interested in making a preclear happy or healthy. They just want to wipe out all the mock-ups they've made in the past which are being held by people which makes them, of course, ridiculed.

Look, for heaven's sakes run this because this will break a case. It's the right to be nothing - as well as "reasons have to exist so I can punish somebody," - will bust a case particularly, but that "right to be nothing," that's real hot. Just run it as a concept in a bracket, just as an idea, so you see what happens here. This is real good. Will you do that?

This is not the universe of betrayal. That's obvious. Its waves go in - pound! pound! pound! pound! - and reduce the thetan to zero. And then they turn around and reflect back out and are held at a distance. And nobody wants that last. That last is really fatal. That is the return of the wave. And they're holding these images out at a distance and that is ridicule.

Audience: We'll do that.

And when the sun shines upon Joe, its waves then turn around and reflect back to Bill, and give - whether Joe wants it or not - a mock-up of Joe to Bill. Bill will eventually get impatient about this if Joe shows any disposition not to like Bill. Therefore, this is the "friendly universe"; everybody has to be friendly. The best thing to be in this universe is friendly.

Don't forget about things like that because we've got to get some subjective/ objective reality on some of these manifestations. We see them in a preclear. We say, "Gee-whiz. Gee-whiz." Like today, I run into "other people's problems."

Now, I'm going to give you another one as long as you were very bad children and need to be punished. Ha-ha! I'm going to give you another one. Run the concept "other people's problems."

Male voice: Just the concept in brackets?

& ...se [universe?] and then we see more and more and more that he only copied what he saw. In other words, he was obsessively in communication with a universe that was held in agreement with one and all.

Just - that's all, in brackets. Just - not in a positive or negative or anything. Just run the concept "other people's problems."

& Now, the CDEI cycle begins at the moment he departs from his own universe. He's curious what would happen if. And if we just wrote that on every tombstone that was out here in every cemetery, we would have the only truthful inscription present. "Dear and loving mother of twelve mourning children," a usual inscription, "Departed from his beloved business and family," another inscription and so on. We look these over, sometimes they're dramatic.

Male voice: Interesting.

& Like there's a couple out in Columbia, California that are very dramatic. One of them says, "Killed by a," this is not a direct quote, "Killed by a sniveling skunk that also tried to cheat him at cards." And the next grave to it says, "The sniveling skunk," erected by his brother, the first man's brother. Very interesting, but those things are not necessarily truthful. But if you put it on there, CDEI....

You got it.

I want you to see that, because there are several of these concepts as they come along - all of a sudden one of them is sitting on top of the case, you know? There are just - there are just a handful of them; there are not very many of them.

& ...and eventually becomes homo sapiens, OK? (Well, that's one of the attainments, stopping time...) Well how could you; what is time but a change of location of a particle in space? So if you change the pace of a particle in space, you'd stop time. (That's right.) That's right. And there's your time, time stops.

All right. And you run any of the subzero scale and you've got yourself a picnic on your hands. But some preclear will be sitting right there all ready to be tripped. Pow!

& OK. Now we've got this reflective quality down, I hope you recognize that. I want you all to do this little silly exercise. It's very silly, but I want you to turn around with your whole body to stop something, not just with your hands. Just turn around and face your whole body with that mock-up. You know, it's coming out radiation, and then your effort to stop that radiation. Do it a few times. Then get the idea, have somebody else stand up there and you just stand there and try to stop the radiation that's coming from him. He's not doing anything. Let's not go into speech or worry about speech. Let's just realize that this is a matter of a pretty solid mock-up, but it's mock-up, it's universe.

Now, the other proposition is here, that somewhere on the case there is a mock-up - this is an interesting little search - there's a mock-up of a person of the current lifetime which, when blown up, releases and frees the case. You can always count on this. There is a person on the case which, when mocked up and blown up, has a tendency to really release the case - real, real surge.

And if you want that elusive button the psychoanalyst is always trying to search for... You know, he's saying, "You push on the button - you push the light switch and the lights turn on," you know? In other words, the guy comes up to 0.0. All you have to do is just find - there's somebody on this case which, when blown up a few times, releases the case.

There's always somebody and you have to usually blow this person up on a gradient scale.

You get a - you get a place where they have been many years ago, and they're now gone from, you blow it up. And then you get a footprint which they left behind in the sand and you blow that up. And then you blow up a shoelace and then you blow up a shoe and then you blow up a finger and then you blow up their hair and then you finally blow them up. And then you get it so it's real good and real fast, and you can blow them up in a heck of a hurry and all of a sudden the preclear feels tremendously relieved!

Just such an automaticity

& as Bert ran into there

- of the third person showing up will show up on any case you've got if you look for it. Anyone has got some slight idea that somebody in this current lifetime - I don't care how Clear this guy is or how well he's feeling or how well his mock-ups are or anything else, he can always get a resurgence on blowing up one person. Now, it isn't any contest of yours to find this person. But if you're ever confronted with the necessity of getting a pretty close release - pretty fast release on a case - you only got about five minutes, you know, and you're going to fix this case up - you just take a look at him and you decide they're a boy trying to be a girl or something of the sort, and you just kind of drift through very fast on various personal relationships. You just decide that there's a change there somehow.

And you - it isn't - you're not blowing up the basic reason, understand? You're just blowing up a person. It'll be Papa. You can always do something with a case by blowing up Mama. Always! You always blow up Mama with good benefit to the case, if you can get her blown up. You can always get her blown up if you blow up by gradient scale. Blow up somebody who- blow up a door post that once saw Mama. Gradient scale.

See, there is a release on the destruction of a personality the preclear is certain is present. He's unable to destroy somebody in the case.

& Anybody who were processing Nibs it'd probably be you'd find out he couldn't blow me up. He could get well immediately, I mean he'd stop being this sick. So that's why he's so well.

Oh, you've been blowing me up, huh?

Okay, that's the end of class.

I'll take care of you later...